An intriguing scenario arose in a project I was working on. In this application, creators can create plugin presets. Presets themselves are associated with “banks” — aka a bank has_many
presets. There are also actions that can be taken against either banks or presets: users generally will bookmark them or download them. Thus these actions have a polymorphic association with both presets and banks.
What I wanted to do was package up all the actions users had performed for banks and related presets created by a particular creator. The resulting ActiveRecord query I arrived at expresses that well. Could this be refactored in a more performant way? (For example, using only one SQL query instead of three?) Very likely. But as this code is run only infrequently for reporting reasons, it’s a reasonable tradeoff between performance and readability.
Here’s the code for the ItemAction.for_creator(creator_profile)
method:
class ItemAction < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :actionable, polymorphic: true
enum action_type: [ :bookmark, :download, :publish ]
def self.for_creator(creator_profile)
banks = creator_profile.banks.published.select(:id)
presets = Preset.where(bank: banks).select(:id)
where(actionable: banks + presets).merge(
ItemAction.bookmark.or(
ItemAction.download
)
)
end
# other code, etc.
end
First, we get the list of banks. We use a published
scope to limit the list to only banks which have been made available to the public. Also, we only need the id field back, not all the fields in the database table.
Second, we get the list of presets for those banks, again pulling in only the id field.
The last line of the method is where things get interesting. We want actions where the actionable
association brings in both the banks and the presets we’ve loaded, so we use the +
operator to concatenate both result sets together. Once we have that relation, we can use ActiveRecord’s merge
functionality to pull in additional scopes that specify we only want either bookmark
or download
actions. We don’t want any other actions (say, publish
), because those are actions taken by creators, not end users.
And that does the trick! Yay! A brief but useful example of the expressive power of adding and merging ActiveRecord relations together to get a final result.
“Ruby is simple in appearance, but is very complex inside, just like our human body.”
matz
Join over 200 fullstack Ruby developers and subscribe to receive a timely tip you can apply directly to your Ruby site or application each week:
Banner image by Michael Dziedzic on Unsplash
Other Recent Articles
Episode 5: Optimized for Programmer Happiness
Ruby is optimized for programmer happiness. What does that even mean? Which programmer? Whose happiness?

What Would It Take for Roda to Win?
Roda’s stated goals are simplicity, reliability, extensibility, and performance. Those are the very reasons why I have become such a Roda stan. It’s so malleable, you can take it in any number of directions in terms of architecture—particularly on the view side which is where my primary interest lies.